« Reproduction and Renewal | Main | My New Riding Buddy »
Intermittent Fasting
May 6, 2005 10:10 AM
Robb Wolf's comment on intermittent fasting is so important that I want to post it here so that it is not overlooked.
First, a few comments. Terms: CR stands for calorie restriction, IF stands for intermittent fasting. I favor IF because it triggers an acute response, which is adaptive, whereas CR triggers a chronic response which is still protective, but less effective because there is an accomodation over time. I go into the reasoning more fully in the book, but it is not hard to see that the signal is more informative if the hormone drives of fasting are pulses rather than continuous.
Point one then is: all the hormone mechanisms one finds in the human body are of a pulsate form and IF can drive these systems more effectively than CR. Secondly, intermittent fasting and gorging with no reduction in total calories maintains body weight and is highly effective in eliciting the healthful pattern. So, you needn't lose body mass. Thirdly, for nearly all of human and pre-human existence intermittent depletion and restoration of energy and nutritional pools was the way of life.
Humans relied on patchy food ranges where there was seasonal, but reasonably reliable low energy dense plants and fugitive and variable high energy animal sources. A successful hunt would have been followed by plenty of eating and rebuilding of stores. But, this overabundance of energy and protein was always temporary. Hence, we humans can overeat prodigiously relative to energy requirements. This is surely an evolved adaptation. But, one that works against us in a modern world where food is continuously rather than intermittently available.
A final point, the fasting period needn't be a day in length as it is in the research Robb cites. I prefer a long overnight fasting period of, say, 15 hours to alternating a day of fasting and a day of eating. I also randomly pick a day when "hunting is lean" (or so I tell myself) to eat sparingly, but I am always active on such a day so my body knows it is to conserve its protein stores and use fat for energy (this is the hGH signal).
Here is Robb's comment with its interesting references and summary of the literature:
"This article does an interesting compare/contrast of CR and IF:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/100/10/6216
It is interesting to note that the biomarkers of the IF protocol have much in common with those observed in the "well fed" state. Increased ketone metabolites and anabolic markers like IGF and hGH.
One also observes the acute adrenal cortical response that is found in the beginning of the CR protocols, however with CR this ACR drops off with time.
Finally, one observes an enhanced neuroendocrine response to exercise in the IF protocol:
http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/full/17/9/1133
My take on this both from experience and theory:
A nutrient dense paleo type diet combined with intermittent fasting and an exercise protocol that produces the maximum neuroendocrine response (Evolutionary Ftiness/CrossFit) produce the effects of both the well-fed state (lean body mass, adequate androgens) and the CR state (enhanced cellular stress response, enhanced systemic adaptability)."
Comments
Hello all.
car insurance | payday loan | web directory | business directory | alprazolam | diazepam | fioricet | hydrocodone | vicodin | tramadol | xanax | valium | ultram | soma | carisoprodol | ambien | ativan | lorazepam | propecia | adipex | didrex | cialis | levitra | paxil | meridia | viagra | wellbutrin | clonazepam | xenical | prozac | butalbital | phentermine | buy vicodin | alprazolam | online pharmacy | tooth whitening | hydrocodone | buy fioricet | buy ultram | buy xanax | buy valium | buy paxil | buy meridia | buy carisoprodol | buy diazepam | buy tramadol | buy soma | buy phentermine | buy cialis | buy levitra | buy didrex | buy adipex | buy ativan | carisoprodol | flower online
Posted by: Flower Online
at September 11, 2006 2:11 PM
I have another question...
Whenever illness looks as though it is to make an appearance in our house, I have taken to putting everyone on a chicken, carrot, cabbage soup broth and veggie/fruit fast (usually for 1 or 2 days as we have growing children). Then the next 2 days we do only meat, veggies and fruit. Absolutely no starch.
Colds seem to last only 3 to 4 days instead of the regular 7 to 10. This has been working for us for 3 years and my son who used to be to the doctor/hopsital every 6 weeks for 'blown up' colds, has not been once in the last 3 years.
Day 5 we add rice (wholegrain of course) or rice and buckwheat in the form of homemade (gf) waffles. Only because the children like to have waffles once in a while and after being so good about a severely restricted diet I do like to reward them. Generally these are topped with honey or peanut butter and honey.
Thoughts? Am I doing more harm than good?
I realize you may not have time to answer but I had to give it a shot.
Kind regards,
KimS
Posted by: kipasa
at August 3, 2006 10:49 AM
Here's a link to a journal article that hits the nail right on the head:
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/96/1/3
Best regards,
Mike
Posted by: Mike at June 2, 2005 4:03 PM
Hello,
I think this article is appropriate re Art's ideas about evolution and intermittent fasting, etc:
http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/96/1/3
Mike
Posted by: Mike at June 2, 2005 3:41 PM
Just to clarify - in regard to IF, are we talking about cutting off food intake around 4-5 hours before sleep and exercising in a fasted state, or are we talking about deliberately going a whole day without any food intake? I've been incorporating the former with great results (more energy, better sleep, lower bodyfat). Thanks.
-Jonathon
Posted by: Jonathon at May 8, 2005 7:59 PM
Hunter gatherers did live in a kind of abundance in places and times. But there is evidence of individual starvation, not the mass starvation that accompanied crop failure after humans became dependent on agriculture. But starvation and periodic fasting are quite different things. Starvation is chronic, periodic fasting is acute. They bring different accommodations.
I don't think Loren would disagree with that point.
Nonetheless, it is an argument that cannot be settled; it is, as I say, an untestable hypothesis. Loren and Jenny tested a stronger hypothesis of wide spread and systematic starvation, which I do think they showed had little evidence to support it (note this is not the same as a rejection). Of course, there are the large scale human extinctions through starvation accompanying volcanic eruptions, most recently about 70,000 years ago.
But, the final point is that, as Robb says, it is a technology that alters body composition to one more like our ancestors and which upregulates insulin sensitivity and good gene expression.
Posted by: Arthur De Vany at May 8, 2005 11:03 AM
Jorge-
One might indeed trigger some catabolism but if the session is fairly short perhaps not problem? If a longer sesssion is pn the agenda it may be beneficial to have a small meal, even just 10-20g of protein. Dr. Tom Fahey of CSU, Chico has found this to be quite anabolic compared to some other pre workout feeding strategies.
Keith-
This is completely my take on this and it may differ somewhat from that of Prof. De Vany. From the reading I have done, talking with Prof. Cordain and looking at his paper:
Cordain L, Miller J, Mann N. Scant evidence of periodic starvation among hunter-gatherers. Diabetologia 1999; 42:383-84.
Link:
http://www.thepaleodiet.com/articles/Diabetologia.pdf
My perspective on this is that if we have nutrition and exercise in accordance with our ancestors we will be strong, lean and fit. We will likely age very well and have a short decline at the end of life. Not bad all things considered.
The intermittent fasting I see as an application of a technology to further enhance these effects of helath and longevity, I do not see it as descriptive of our evolutionary heritage per se.
No proof on any of this! Gust an educated guess and some personal experience.
Posted by: Robb Wolf at May 8, 2005 9:28 AM
Robb,
If we get diet and exercise right, evolutionary theory points to our having good physical and mental health. However, I don't think we can assume that longevity will be the result of following the Evolutionary Fitness diet and exercise suggestions. Although there is evidence of hunter-gatherers living into their 60s, there are only isolated examples of them living much beyond that. Perhaps it's just a lack of surviving reliable evidence. Certainly, there were evolutionary advantages to a tribal group which had older members - the "grandmother hypothesis" is the best illustration of these - but I think we are treading new ground here. I may go out like a light at 65!
Posted by: Keith Thomas at May 7, 2005 5:48 AM
Robb
Here's my concern ,some of which you have addressed(thanks) and I'm sure will be covered in the book. AM fasted exercise if on the low end can be muscle sparing and great for fat burning but once you crank it up and you have an afterburn, as with the EPOC effect one would get while doing CF or evolutionary exercise and hierarchical sets, would muscle loss not be triggered if your in that fasted state?
Posted by: Jorge Carvajal at May 6, 2005 10:09 PM
Jorge-
Gluconeogenesis certainly could play a factor in this but virtually all of the bodies tissues can and do adapt to ketones as a fuel source. It is important to note that one need not consume an "Atkins" type diet to produce significant ketone bodies. Intense exercise can spike the levels in a dose response fashion and the act of following an IF protocol will also increase ketone bodies, regardless of the type of diet consumed. Add a higher fat diet to the equation the the effect is greatly enhanced.
Ketone bodies improve nitrogen ballance, are neuroprotective and decreasee the need for n-3, n-6 essential fatty acids. Good, good stuff.
One should not necessarilly quit eating all carbohydrate sources however! Part of the plan involves the hormone drives elicited only through intense exercise. Intense exercise requires glycogen stores. The metabolic byproduct of intense exercise, lactate, is very important in some gene signaling cascades that are very favorable for power and longevity.
As to whether or not IF really does extend life...it has in every experiment thus far and with better results than CR.
Not quite conclusive proof, but compelling enough for me to make dinner early and push breakfast back a few hours till after I have exercised.
Posted by: Robb Wolf at May 6, 2005 7:44 PM
"I prefer a long overnight fasting period of, say, 15 hours to alternating a day of fasting and a day of eating. I also randomly pick a day when "hunting is lean" (or so I tell myself) to eat sparingly, but I am always active on such a day so my body knows it is to conserve its protein stores and use fat for energy (this is the hGH signal)."
On these days is gluconeogenesis not a factor for the body, because of brain glucose requirements...a lean eating day but active?
I like overnight 15 hours fasting also, as long as its done randomly.
If intermittent fasting turns out to improve longevity without calorie reduction,that would be very exciting, But, I'd probably put dollars against it.
Posted by: Jorge Carvajal at May 6, 2005 6:11 PM
Mr De Vany,
I cannot tell you how much I enjoy your site. You have answered questions that I have had for along time in regards to living a VITAL long life. The IF protocol, coupled with brief infrequent "bursts" of activity, makes so much sense to me.
BTW: took your advice and changed my PWO meal to a balanced protein/fat meal ( ex: mixed vegetables and fish) and am noticing an improvement in my results.
Am very much looking forward to your book.
Sincerely,
Matthew Smith
Posted by: Matthew Smith at May 6, 2005 1:35 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)